Post

Eye Surgery Considerations

Mate Community Review

After having posterior and lower canthoplasty, there were quite a few parts I was dissatisfied with, so I went around for consultations about revision/restoration. The consultant here was very honest, and she said that my eyes don’t look that strange even now, and that if I restore them, my eyes will get smaller. She honestly told me not to do restoration, so I felt warmth from that..! The director was also honest and conservative, and because the side effects in my eyes aren’t severe right now, he said he didn’t recommend restoration. He even turned on a flashlight and carefully checked the visible conjunctiva and whether there was any gaping!! Still, he said that if I wanted to go back to my original eyes, he could remove scar tissue and release adhesions. It seemed like he explained things as much as possible according to my needs. He did say that even if I do this, functional side effects may be hard to improve, and the shape may not return. He really seems honest and conservative x2 But what bothers me is that when I said there was another clinic I had consulted that mentioned scar tissue removal + adhesion release, the director said, "That’s Si-s or Si-eung, right??" so it made me wonder if this isn’t a common surgical method.. It has risks too, and maybe there’s no need to do it, so I’m thinking that Anyway, it doesn’t seem like a clinic that sees patients only as money... Except for the parts that bother me, I’m satisfied with everything....

View on sungyesa

Clinics mentioned

No replies yet.

More in this category