*Summary: Rather than carefully considering the patient’s perspective or condition, they focus on the method that is more convenient for themselves to operate. They do not explain in detail how the surgery will proceed or what the risks of the method are; their style is basically just to say it is no big deal and trust them. So you need to study the surgery method yourself before meeting them. Even right after surgery, I did not receive any feedback about what it looked like when they opened it up, what went well, or what did not go well.
What gave me trust during the revision consultation was that they honestly told me there was no problem with my nose and that the previous doctor had done a good job. The style is indeed not excessive, but rather natural in a way that is stuck in a standard mold rather than individuality? It seemed like they pursued a textbook style (for reference, they like a straight-bridge line) and the quickest, most convenient surgical method from the doctor’s point of view (if the tip of the nose is touched, they prefer an open approach without exception). I had doubts about whether we really communicated properly, because I value individuality and a natural look that still feels like my own face, but I did not want anything dramatic, just a very slight correction, and the doctor said my case was low difficulty, so in the end it seemed like he understood the point, which is why I went ahead. It has not been long since the surgery, so it may be too early to reach a conclusion, but if you are looking for a doctor who uses imagination to match each person’s distinct individuality and applies surgical methods flexibly, I recommend looking for someone else. +Oh, and for reference, the directors tend to either act like they know too much or know nothing at all, so just take what they say with a grain of salt!!!