I previously had natural adhesion + epicanthoplasty, but lately I've been getting overlapping creases, so I'm trying to have it fixed again. 1. ㅈㅇㅈㅇ When I said I wanted non-incisional, they recommended natural adhesion + ptosis correction. They said there was no need to raise the line much. The line they created for me was pretty. The consultation ended within 5 minutes! No pressure to book, and it was comfortable, so I liked it. 2. ㄴㅅㅎ As rumored, the director was chic. They said I only need natural adhesion + ptosis correction, and because I have protruding eyes, I shouldn't get greedy. I liked the line they made for me. It was natural and not excessive. When I asked, Do I need canthoplasty or anything? They firmly said noㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ Here too, there was no pressure to book, and they were kind and comfortable. 3. ㅎㄴ As expected from an eye surgery specialist, the doctor was funny. They looked right at my eyes and said the overlapping creases happen because I have protruding eyes. They made a line for me, and it was all similar to the previous clinics. I think the estimate is on the expensive side. They strongly recommended eye fat grafting, saying protruding eyes will develop overlapping creases again anyway as I age. Natural adhesion + eye shape reinforcement (seems like the clinic's own technique) + eye fat grafting Overall, they all made similar lines for me, but I'm wondering if the last clinic's own eye shape reinforcement? might make it less likely to loosen, so I'm really tornㅠㅠ
Sympathy emoticon
Translating
Do you want to scrap this review? +0
Hungry-neng's posts: see more
Broker suspicion report Block member