Two consultations for male non-incisional eye correction, thin double eyelid preferred. Torn between incision vs no incision

I'm a man, and instead of an obvious double eyelid, I want something closer to no-double-eyelid or at most a very thin inner double eyelid, so I've been going to consultations for eye correction. The first place was a one-doctor clinic. I liked that the surgeon's consultation was long and that they explained side effects and possible future changes in detail. They said that with my eyes, if I did the non-incisional method, the area between my eyebrows and eyes could look more protruded, so they recommended the incisional method. At the consultation, the prices were 1.4 million for non-incisional and 1.9 million for incisional. But they also explained that after eye surgery, folds or wrinkles could appear near the nose or around the eyes, and that later I might even consider a brow lift, so I wasn't sure whether they were explaining general possibilities or whether those risks were actually high in my specific case. The second place was a large hospital, and they quoted 770,000 won for non-incisional eye correction. The consultation with the surgeon was quite short, and after checking my eyes once, they told me to bring photos of the shape I want. They suggested making a reservation deposit of 100,000 won on the day of the consultation, so I went ahead and booked it for now, but I'm still thinking about it because they didn't give a specific reason for recommending that method or much explanation about side effects. It's the same eyes, but one place recommends incision and the other recommends no incision, so I'm even more confused. For those of you who were told your brow bone/upper eyelid area could look more prominent like me, what method were you recommended? If it's your first surgery, would it be better to consult a few more hospitals before deciding?