Consultation proceeded in the order consultant, director, consultant Without taking photos, we looked in the mirror, set the line, and had the consultation
Both the director and consultant were moderately kind The director explained things in detail, but his aesthetic standards were so firm that it felt like one-sided instruction rather than a two-way conversation… In particular, during the consultant’s session, among the many before-and-after photos shown, I saw that the after eyes all looked uniformly the same, so I felt my opinions would not be reflected in the surgery, and my expectations for surgery dropped sharply (I emphasized that I wanted a very natural result, to the point that others might think, “Did they get it done? No? Maybe?”)
My assessment is that this seems to be the result of a conflict between this director’s aesthetic standards and the patient’s needs…
The cost was surprising too.. They said that because I had medial epicanthoplasty in the past, it counts as revision surgery, but even aside from the revision medial epicanthoplasty cost, the under-eye fat repositioning and posterior-inferior canthoplasty costs were also the highest among the clinics I visited
They seemed to be thoroughly doing marketing and silencing negative talk while drawing in customers, so everyone, please read all the surgical reviews before choosing a clinic…