Because she was a woman, I trusted her more and had double eyelid surgery with the buried-stitched method. I got a direct consultation from the director, and after deciding to go with an in-out line and wanting the line to be visible when my eyes were open, we checked the line and decided to proceed with buried-stitched surgery. But on the day of surgery, she checked the line again. Then she said it could tuck inward completely, and I was extremely shocked. She said something different right before surgery than she had said during the consultation. Since I couldn't run away, I was put on the operating table anyway. After the surgery, only the back line of the eye was visible. One side also had a protruding stitch. When I told them about it, they said that if the swelling went down in about 3 months they'd check the progress and do a revision, but since it's hard for office workers to make time, and I thought frequent revisions would be bad, I just left it alone. As expected, that protruding stitch gradually went inward and the double eyelid gradually loosened, so after 3 years the double eyelid on one eye completely came undone... The double eyelid line is natural, but the fact that a stitch mark protruded after surgery, the fact that they changed their words right before surgery, and the fact that they operated with a different line than the one discussed during consultation I'm looking into revision surgery now, and I won't be going back here.. I guess that doctor is still there... what a pity.
- Doctor
- Doctor (anonymous)
- Price
- Not disclosed
- Visit type
- 수술경험