Post

Eye Re-Surgery

Eye revision... I really don’t know anymore

This is my 3rd eye revision, and my sausage eyes haven’t improved, so I looked around to make this the last one. I narrowed it down to 2 places. 1. ㄱㄴ (ㅇㄱㅎ) Double-line excision, the distance between my eyes is narrow, so they plan to lower the line a lot (naturally, into an inline crease). Scarring may remain. When I said I was worried about the scar area, they said scars can’t be helped, and if it really bothers me, I can get scar improvement later. They don’t recommend excising the entire scar area for scar improvement. Also, the current scarring on my eyes isn’t severe. They said the photos I showed had lines that were too high and didn’t suit me, so it would be better to make it natural and lower the line. There isn’t absolutely no extra skin. 2. ㅇ ㅇ () Double-line excision, and it would be better to lower the line only a little, about 2 mm. They also plan to remove the existing scar at the same time (I think they said they would excise the scar area). Improving the sausage-eye look and making it natural come first. The current scarring on my eyes is also severe, so scar removal won’t be easy, but it needs to be done. There is no extra skin. I’m torn.. 1. Looking at reviews, it seems like ㄱㄴ has more, but ㅇ ㅇㅋ() is an eye-specialized hospital, so would it be better to do it at an eye-specialized hospital? 2. I saw a review saying the eye line at ㅇ ㅇㅋ() looked bent.. My current eye line is bent, so I’m stressed about that.. I wonder if it was because I previously had it done by a doctor who specializes in men’s eyes. 3. ㅇ ㅇㅋ() said there’s no scar and no swelling after incision. Looking at ㄱ ㄴ’s before-and-after photo reviews too, it seems like the line was lowered well. Which of the two would be better? Has anyone here tried them?

View on sungyesa

More in this category