I had revision surgery because the line was raised, the fixation was deep, and that caused a sausage-like eyelid, an overly prominent line, and so on. I wasn’t pursuing anything aesthetic at all; I just asked for it to look natural, absolutely natural, with the line as low as possible. The doctor was confident and honest. After the surgery, my eyes looked much more natural, but the line did not reduce dramatically, nor was there a huge improvement, the way I had hoped and the doctor had assured me it would. It improved compared to my previous eyes, I guess? I felt that the result of revision surgery can never be completely free from the result of the first surgery. I’m generally satisfied, but if I could go back, I’d want to have it done somewhere else... Still, this is not a place that gives results where you think, “It would have been better not to have revision surgery at all.” If someone is not severely botched like me, and if they have good skin tissue quality, I think this hospital could produce sufficiently good results. I’ve made the hospital information public, so if you’re curious, please check below.
This review is a surgery review that pursues a natural look.