Post

Nose Surgery Reviews

I’ve been visiting clinics for rhinoplasty and am trying to decide on the final clinic

I visited about 8 clinics, and I’m torn between the final two. I wanted no implant, and the bridge of my nose near the glabella is very low. Some places said that if I want to raise the nasal bridge, I absolutely need silicone, or if I hate that no matter what, I should at least use dermis. Others said that if I want something natural from the start, it can be done with cartilage only, and there were many opinions like that. I narrowed it down to two, but I’m still unsure.. I have a hump, very little midface dimensionality, and I’m worried about a protruding mouth. The first can do it with septal cartilage + ear cartilage only. Just from looking at the reviews, it looked natural and I could tell exactly what the doctor’s aesthetic sense was like. But since it’s done with cartilage only, I’m worried it might be too natural, or if it gets absorbed a bit or droops later, it might sink again. The second uses septal cartilage + ear cartilage + donated costal cartilage. When I said I didn’t like silicone, they said they would build the nasal bridge with cartilage, then use the remaining cartilage + donated costal cartilage for the nasal tip. At the other places I visited, they said my skin is thin and, considering my overall look, I probably wouldn’t need donated costal cartilage. I’m not considering dermis because many people say it gets absorbed later and creates a step-off, so I ruled out the places that said I needed dermis.. Between the first and second, which do you think would be better?

View on sungyesa

More in this category