When I had double eyelid surgery before, I had a partial incision, and since it's been over 10 years, the line has weakened and there are parts that have come undone, so I'm looking into revision surgery. I've been to about 10 clinics now.. Among the clinics I visited, 5 recommended incisional surgery, and 5 recommended natural adhesion. Even among the places that recommended incisional surgery, 3 of them said if I want natural adhesion, my eyes are suitable for it, so which one would be better to do...? Why do the doctors all have different opinionsㅠㅠ I'm worried that adhesion might come undone after doing it, and I'm worried that incisional surgery might look too obviousㅠㅠ
김볶밥2 If it were me, if a non-incisional method lasted 10 years, I think natural adhesion would hold up well too??
뉴요커31 [@김볶밥2] What I had 10 years ago was a partial incision! But the part that seems like it came undone was from a few years ago. If it's like this, would natural adhesion still be okay? ㅠㅠ I'm really torn
김볶밥2 [@뉴요커31] If the clinics said both are okay, then it's completely up to your preference. Speaking from my standards, there's no guarantee that an incision absolutely won't come undone either, and considering a surgery with less trauma and one that's easier to manage if it goes wrong, I wonder if natural adhesion might be better?
뉴요커31 [@김볶밥2] Aww, I see! Honestly, I'm leaning toward adhesion because I feel like if I do incision and it goes wrong, it would be hard to fix. Thank you for writing such a detailed replyㅠㅠ♥
k넘원 *Deleted by the poster.
뉴요커31 [@k넘원] I see! If you don't mind, after the buried suture method, how does the staying power seem??