Surgical method: natural adhesion buried suture method Situation: revision surgery after surgery 10 years ago (previously had non-incisional ptosis correction + medial epicanthoplasty + buried suture method) It started loosening 4 years ago and disappeared completely, causing severe asymmetry, so I proceeded with revision surgery. For a quick recovery, I wanted to avoid incisions as much as possible, and I mainly consulted doctors who recommended the buried suture method. I definitely prefer a natural-looking eye shape, so I looked mainly for clinics focused on natural results and revision surgery rather than flashy results. Among them, Director Lee Hanbyeol at EyeTing said I only needed natural adhesion with the buried suture method, so rather than unnecessarily touching other things, I wanted to maintain my current eye shape as much as possible. Especially during the consultation, she was positive and kind, so I think I decided quickly on the day of the consultation. The surgery ended quickly, and I usually do not swell much, but she drew the line very meticulously and cleanly, so the swelling was even less and I did not bruise either. Above all, asymmetry was my concern, and I am happy that this part has improved a lot. I had heard elsewhere that, because the degree of protrusion of my eyes themselves is slightly different between both eyes, the line could not be corrected perfectly precisely. Still, overall I am satisfied in terms of eye size and double eyelid size. Lastly, Director LHB at EYT pursues naturalness, so I think people with a similar aesthetic preference will get a natural or naturally glamorous line!!
Like 1
Empathy emoticon
Translating
Would you like to bookmark this review? +0
This review is a surgical review pursuing natural beauty.