Impression when I went in: clean. A moderate number of people. Staff were kind. The consultation room was actually smaller in the director's office. Consultant: actually better at consulting than the doctor. No pressure. 1) Nose: noticed that my nose was crooked, and said that if I only do the nasal tip, a step-off in the nasal bridge may be visible. I also liked that she recommended reinforcing the nasal bridge. However, she did not recommend the autologous dermis I had been considering because it is almost completely absorbed later. She actually discouraged me from it. 2) Eyes: I said that I thought a thin inner double eyelid line would suit my face, and I was recommended ptosis correction, natural adhesion, and 45-degree dual canthoplasty.
Doctor: I was surprised because he was smiling when I first went into the consultation. 1) Nose: He did not mention that my nose was slightly crooked, and like the consultant, said that because of the step-off in the nasal bridge it could look like a semi-ski-slope nose. Recommended septal cartilage + autologous cartilage + bulbous nose correction. 2) Eyes: He designed the line for me. He tried the line I wanted several times, and I did not like it that much, but since simply holding a line with forceps is inherently uncertain, I thought it was okay. He recommended the same things as the consultant. The canthoplasty that the consultant discouraged, the doctor said he could do. I think it was because I showed him the photos I wanted.
Overall: The consultant actually felt more like the doctor. The director seems like a cheerful type? Maybe because he does a lot of YouTube... I think I'll look for more reviews, visit more clinics, and then decide! It did not seem like the director lacked skill.