Under-Eye Fat Repositioning and Double-Eyelid Consultation Review

I first went to [Clinic A] in Sinsa because I heard they were conservative. As expected, they weren’t the type to recommend unnecessary procedures. They said under-eye fat repositioning would probably be good for my eyes, but that medial canthoplasty wasn’t necessary. The issue was my double eyelids. I already had lines on both sides, but they were asymmetrical and one eye had slightly weaker opening strength. They said I could have a buried-suture procedure because I already had lines, but there wouldn’t be much change. They said a non-incisional ptosis correction could make a slight adjustment, but that since my eyes were ambiguous, simply living with them wasn’t a bad option either...;; The surgeon at [Clinic B], formerly from a Gangnam clinic, said I should have under-eye fat repositioning plus fat grafting. For the double eyelids, they also recommended a non-incisional procedure plus non-incisional ptosis correction. They said complications were almost nonexistent and spoke with great confidence, as the reviews suggested, but explained everything as if it were extremely simple. The chief surgeon at [Clinic C] in Gangnam did not recommend fat grafting together with under-eye fat repositioning. They said because I have fat under the front cheek area, adding fat grafting would make me look even puffier. They said my double-eyelid case was not simple. Because my right eye has weaker opening strength, they said partial-incision surgery was necessary. They said if ptosis correction were done on only one side, the other eye would droop again, so both sides should be corrected together. The price was insanely high, so even if I want it, I may not be able to do it.

Under-Eye Fat Repositioning and Double-Eyelid Consultation Review

More in this category