I had natural adhesion buried suture surgery 10 years ago, and I’m thinking about revision surgery. Because I have a lot of muscle and fat above my eyes, the in-out line I originally had has almost turned into an inline crease, so I’m planning to get revision surgery.
I visited 4-5 clinics, and what they commonly said was: Even if I get non-incisional revision surgery, I’ll eventually need incisional surgery later. With non-incisional, it will get covered again. Incisional surgery can also get covered later as I age, but the result is definitely more reliable than non-incisional. Since I want it to look natural for now, they said if I want to do non-incisional first, I can.
No. 1 Non-incisional revision eye surgery + epicanthoplasty 2.2 million KRW They said my eyes would look too heavy with an outline crease, so they recommend non-incisional first. I have to post on three places including an app and cafe, and I think I have to upload reviews 3 times.
No. 2 Incisional double eyelid surgery + epicanthoplasty 2 million KRW They said eyes like mine should be done with incision, and if I do non-incisional, I won’t be satisfied again and will end up getting revision surgery later. No need to post on an app; only need to allow photos as an eye model for their website.
No. 1 is a clinic that opened within the last 3 years, so there aren’t many reviews, but they’re pretty good. No. 2 is a clinic that opened around 10 years ago, so it has over a thousand reviews, and there are a very small number of dissatisfied ones, about 3-5, saying the line came out less defined than expected.
If you were me, which one would you choose?