The before-and-after photos were so appealing that I went in for a consultation, and the consultation was ordinary~ The cost was also cheaper than in Seoul.. But they mostly use septal cartilage, which was different from what I was aiming for, so I passed. Everything else was good. The director also did not exaggerate things, which I liked.
Clinics mentioned
More in this category
Nose Surgery@rhinoOct 17 Mind review
I went there for a consultation for my first nose surgery, and because my septal cartilage was small, they recommended autologous costal cartilage and donor costal cartilage. It’s been a while since the consultation, so I don’t remember…
Nose Surgery@rhinoSep 16 Seo Sang-woo review
I went for a consultation about removal. When they looked at the shape, they said not to remove it, but that they would still aim for my original nose shape with the surgery. I only wanted removal, but there were extra things like…
Nose Surgery@rhinoSep 14 Ahn community review
I had my first consultation here. After taking a CT scan, they said my septum is bent and on the small side, so I would need mesh (while two other hospitals said my own septum would be enough). They said they would decide in the operating…
Nose Surgery@rhinoSep 1 Kim Sangbeom Review
They said men shouldn't touch the septum, and that a bulbous nose wouldn't change as much as I expected. During the surgery they woke me up and said they'd try several silicone heights. It seems like they consider the patient's desired…
Nose Surgery@rhinoAug 29 Kim Sangbeom review
I was the only one who had much more consultation with the doctor than with the consultation coordinator. He was kind and also picked up on my facial features. It seemed like he pursued naturalness rather than overdoing it, and because he…
Nose Surgery@rhinoAug 25 Gangnam An review
An Plastic Surgery They said to use donor rib. It felt like they especially recommended donor rib. They said if you don’t use donor rib, they can’t raise it much. I had a CT scan, and at another place my septum was said to be 2.1, but here