I had a consultation with Director ㅇㄱㅇ at ㅁㅇㄷ and booked surgery right away.
To start with the conclusion, he told me to choose between two surgical methods, so I’m a bit conflicted.
The cost is the same for both methods (cost 4.3 million KRW: silicone or no implant, septal cartilage, ear cartilage, bulbous nose correction, hump correction, osteotomy, alar reduction. Add 700,000 KRW if donated costal cartilage is added)
The first method is to insert 2 mm silicone to enhance the nasal bridge more,
and the second is a no-implant method, without silicone, refining the entire nose to make it look natural.
My nasal bridge itself isn’t low, but the glabella area is low, so I’m debating whether to enhance the bridge around the glabella or not.
The director said both are good methods, and if I dislike silicone and want something natural, he recommended the second one.
For something a bit more glamorous that makes the facial impression stand out more, he mentioned the first one.
Personally, I’m drawn to the first option, but there are so many negative images around silicone that I’m worried..
Some people say it’s fine, and others say there are side effects. If it were you, which would you recommend??
If silicone doesn’t have major side effects, silicone would be better, right??